The revelation of an unknown reality
Recently, the leak of statements by Elisa Mouliaá and Íñigo Errejón in a judicial process has exposed a problem that often goes unnoticed. The judicial arena, far from being a safe space for victims, can become a labyrinth full of obstacles and prejudices.
Alarming numbers and the reality of sexual violence
The statistics on sexual violence are worrying: it is estimated that less than 10% of incidents are reported. Despite this, institutions often seem to ignore this underreporting. The question to ask is: how are victims treated once they decide to take the step of reporting?
The response of the judicial system
The conduct of Judge Adolfo Carretero, of Madrid’s 47th Magistrate’s Court, is not an isolated case. His attitude towards victims reflects a worrying trend, where professional ethics are overshadowed by personal prejudices.
The role of the General Council of the Judiciary
Complaints against judges like Carretero have reached the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), which is responsible for investigating such conduct. However, corporatism can make it difficult to take effective measures. Furthermore, the lack of guarantees for victims who complain creates an environment of impunity.
The impact of the leak
The leaked videos have served to show a reality that is often questioned. Without these images, the victims’ stories would be subject to doubt, a common mechanism that perpetuates the existence of patriarchal myths that minimize their experience.
The role of judges and patriarchal culture
Justice does not operate in a vacuum; judges are part of a society that has been socialized in patriarchal values. This can lead to decisions that revictimize those affected, rather than offering real support.
Cases that make a difference
However, there are judges who challenge this stereotype. Rulings like those in the Alves case demonstrate that a pedagogical and empathetic approach to sexual violence is possible, creating safe spaces for victims.
Need for profound reforms
The judicial system requires a thorough overhaul. It is not just about changing procedures on paper, but about transforming the internal dynamics that perpetuate sexism and institutional violence.
The courts, with their marked hierarchies, need real transparency that allows for oversight of actions and the defense of people’s rights. Only then can we begin to see significant changes in the judicial response to gender-based violence.
