A controversial guide to the corporate mail of the Spanish judiciary
Rumors and controversy have arisen around a guide sent through the corporate mail chat of the General Council of the Judiciary, where an association of judges has disseminated recommendations to avoid the application of the amnesty law. The recommendations include actions such as raising the issue of amnesty to the Court of Justice of the European Union or the Constitutional Court. This initiative has generated disagreements between conservative and progressive judges, accusing each other of politicizing justice.
An active chat for over a decade
This chat in the corporate email of the General Council of the Judiciary was launched in 2008 and has been the scene of debates and discussions, particularly intense during the years of the process.
Polarized reactions between conservative and progressive judges
Opinions of conservative judges
The conservative sector of the judges has welcomed these recommendations, but the progressives have rejected them. Conservatives criticize the amnesty as a cowardly and partial measure, accusing its promoters of interfering with the work of judges and acting politically.
Opinions of progressive judges
Progressive judges reject the recommendations and accuse conservatives of political interventionism. They consider the amnesty an unjust measure and accuse its promoters of distorting the function of judges. These differences have generated an escalation of tensions and reproaches between the different groups of judges.
Inequality of opinions
The extreme views are reflected in the words of the judges, evidencing the division between those who regard the amnesty as a partial and cowardly measure, and those who reject it as political interference. This situation has generated a tense and polarized atmosphere within the Spanish judiciary.
Reactions to the controversy
The divergent perspectives on the guide to avoid the application of the amnesty law have generated an atmosphere full of acrimony and mutual criticism, evidencing the existing tensions within the Spanish judiciary.
