Pedagogy as art more than as science
Education, a constantly evolving field, is often perceived as a science. However, its nature is rather an amalgam of techniques and methods we learn over time. In Spain, numerous professionals in the educational sector, including pedagogues, are engaged in researching and applying these strategies, but the essence of education cannot be reduced to a set of scientific theories.
The example of Estonia: A model to follow
Estonia has become a benchmark in the educational world, achieving excellent results in the PISA tests. The key to its success lies in its approach to pedagogy, which is not based on rigid science, but on a repertoire of techniques that have shown its effectiveness. Estonian teachers constantly experiment with new methodologies and adjust their strategies based on real classroom experience.
The lack of a unified paradigm
One of the great challenges of pedagogy is his lack of a unified paradigm. Unlike other disciplines such as physics or biology, which are based on consolidated theories, pedagogy is presented as a mosaic of opinions and approaches. This diversity can be enriching, but it is also difficult to establish a clear path towards an effective educational model.
Xavier Melgarejo: a pioneer in practical education
Xavier Melgarejo, a recognized pedagogue, was a supporter of the Finnish educational model, who already showed promising results before the famous PISA tests. Melgarejo not only analyzed this system, but also sought to implement its principles in its own school, highlighting both its strengths and its limitations.
The impact of your vision
His doctoral dissertation caught the attention of numerous politicians, even some of them traveled to Finland to learn from their successes. However, over time, many forgot their contributions and continued with their own political agendas, leaving aside the practical solutions that Melgarejo had defended.
A reflection on the future of education
Melgarejo was a man of principles, with a passion for education and an unshakable commitment to continuous improvement. His fight against cancer strengthened his determination to seek real solutions for education, and his criticism of institutional mediocrity resonated in many. Your rhetorical question about the effectiveness of the Finnish model invites us to reflect: if we know how to solve educational problems, why not do it?
Melgarejo’s legacy urges us to move the focus of theoretical discussions to specific and proven actions. It is time to prioritize the practical experiences and methodologies that have shown to be effective, in order to build a fairer and more effective education system for all students.