A case that stirs emotions
The latest episode of ‘Crims’, presented by Carles Porta, has provoked a visceral reaction among viewers. In this installment, the program addressed a delicate incident that shook the community of Cànoves and Samalús in 2003, focusing on the tragic fate of Àngel Vila, popularly known as l’Angelet.
The crime that shook a town
The serenity of this small town was shattered during the night of June 21-22, when two individuals, Francisco Martel and Cándido Caballero, assaulted the elderly victim, ending her life in an act of extreme violence. The story has resurfaced with force, rekindling the pain and outrage in the community.
Tragic consequences
The investigation into the case was marred by the death of Cándido in a traffic accident, while Francisco was convicted for his involvement. Recently, the news that Martel has regained his freedom has ignited social media, provoking a torrent of disapproving comments among the audience.
Outrage among viewers
The impact of this revelation has been immediate. Users have expressed their discomfort, highlighting the surprise that a criminal with such a brutal past could be at large. Comments such as ‘Little is said about the fact that Francis is now at large’ or ‘The most disturbing thing is that this psychopath is on the street’ have resonated strongly on digital platforms.
Unanswered questions
The outrage is not limited to Martel’s case. There is concern about the role of the authorities in the investigation: ‘How is it possible that the national police did not inform the Mossos of Francis’ situation?’ some users have asked, reflecting a lack of trust in the system.
An unexpected audience record
Despite the controversy, the episode has achieved a record audience for ‘Crims’, reaching a 23% screen share with 490,000 viewers. This popularity demonstrates Carles Porta’s power to captivate the audience with stories of true events, combining informative rigor with an absorbing narrative.
Reflections on today’s society
This situation leads us to reflect on the implications of justice and security in our society. The ability of a program like ‘Crimes’ to generate debate is a testament to its relevance, but it also highlights the questions that remain unresolved in the judicial system.