The former number two of Equality is convicted for defaming the ex-husband of the former president of Infancia Libre

An Estepona court condemns Ángela Rodríguez ‘Pam’

Ángela Rodríguez ‘Pam’ has been convicted by a court in Estepona for violating the right to honor of the ex-husband of María Sevilla, former president of Infancia Libre. The ruling establishes that Rodríguez must pay compensation of 10,500 euros to Rafael M. In addition, he is ordered to disseminate the ruling in various media, such as the RTVE program La Noche en 24 Horas, and on the social networks Tiktok, Instagram and Facebook of Hey! Universe Media. This publication must be set to have the same public dissemination as Rodríguez’s defamatory statements.

Rodríguez’s defamatory statements

The sentence is based on statements made by Ángela Rodríguez when she was Secretary of State for Equality. In a television interview, Rodríguez referred to María Sevilla’s ex-husband as an ‘abuser’, which violated her right to her honor. The judge considered that these statements were defamatory and lacked minimal factual basis, since the plaintiff had not been convicted of violent acts and there were no proceedings against her at that time.

Rodriguez’s response

In response to a talk show on Channel 24 Horas, Rodríguez once again referred to the case of María Sevilla and stated that the Government had pardoned a woman who had kidnapped her son. Furthermore, he described the child’s father as an ‘abuser’ and stated that abusers are not good parents. The ruling highlights that these statements lacked a factual basis and recalled that all the complaints filed against the plaintiff had been archived in the investigation phase due to lack of evidence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Ángela Rodríguez ‘Pam’ has been convicted of defaming María Sevilla’s ex-husband. The ruling establishes financial compensation and the dissemination of the ruling in various media. Rodríguez’s defamatory statements were considered a violation of the plaintiff’s right to honor. The ruling highlights that these statements had no factual basis and that all complaints filed against the plaintiff had been archived. It is important to remember that defamation can have legal consequences and that it is necessary to respect people’s right to honor.

Related posts

The Train Journ

Trump’s strategy: Greenland as a geoconomic key

The Tortosa Night Revolution: Records of an Era Golden