An amazing approach to safety
The European Commission recently launched a plan that includes a ‘survival kit’ for Citizens, while at the same time strict restrictions on self -sufficiency are maintained. This initiative has aroused intense debate about its coherence and effectiveness.
The propose context
The security situation in Europe has become more and more complex. At a time when the media tuned with the alarm on external threats, the commission made an announcement that, at first glance, seemed a reaction to the growing concerns about safety of the continent.
The concerns of experts
Analysts and commentators have stated that security and freedom in Europe are in a precarious situation, not only because of the intensification of external attacks but also by the internal dynamics that seem to ignore the real needs of citizens.
What does the kit include?
The proposed survival kit includes elements such as water and food, as well as iodine tablets for possible nuclear emergencies. However, the absence of tools for food self -production is disturbing, considering that they could be vital in a crisis situation.
Obvious contradictions
Faced with the recommendation of preparing for emergencies, the paradox is highlighted, which at the same time penalizes the production of food at the domestic level. This generates questions about the true intention behind this kit.
The lack of actual preparation
Interestingly, kit does not include recommendations for the use of firearms or training in use, an aspect that might seem essential in a conflict scenario. This contrasts with historical examples of nations that have equipped their citizens to defend themselves.
An obsolet model?
The image of a confined European citizen, depending on authorities for their safety, evokes a feudal system where power is concentrated in the hands of a few, while the population remains passive. In a world where democracy was born, this dynamic is worrying.
Final reflections
The European Commission’s strategy may be more revealed about its own insecurities than on external threats. If the rulers perceive their own people as a potential enemy, this leads us to question who really is the real adversary in this dynamic of power.