Boye, the convention-defying lawyer
Gonzalo Boye, the lawyer of Carles Puigdemont, has become a controversial figure in the current political scene. His communication strategy is based on irony and the use of subtle messages, especially through the X platform, where he has a base of more than 245,000 followers who respond effusively to his posts.
A symbolic act and the reaction of the authorities
Recently, Puigdemont made a public appearance at the Arc de Triomf in Barcelona, an act laden with symbolism after seven years in exile. His presence was a reminder that, according to him, Catalan independence is still alive. Boye, in an attention-grabbing tweet, hinted that civil disobedience actions are often misinterpreted before they are recognized as effective.
The implicit message
Although Boye does not explicitly mention who he is referring to, many assume he is talking about his client, Puigdemont. His strategy is clear: to use irony to support a narrative that challenges the Spanish authorities and the criticisms that have arisen.
Criticism of the police system
After his disappearance, Joan Ignasi Elena, former interior minister, described Junts’ attitude as an attempt to undermine Salvador Illa’s investiture plenum. Elena argued that the Mossos were not prepared for the unexpected maneuver of Puigdemont, who disappeared immediately after his speech.
A strong answer
Elena criticized the ‘false attacks’ against the security forces, saying that the situation had been manipulated to make it appear that the current Government was complicit in a Spanish strategy. These claims were supported by Jordi Turull, general secretary of Junts, who described the police reaction as ‘unfortunate’.
Reflections on the future
The dynamic between Puigdemont, Boye and the Spanish authorities will continue to be a hot topic as events unfold. Boye’s irony and his advocacy of civil disobedience raise questions about legality and legitimacy in today’s political context. This scenario, marked by tensions and diverse interpretations, invites us to reflect on the role of political leaders and their influence on the public debate.