An EU disturbing message
The European Union recently launched a warning to its citizens: preparing a survival kit to deal with extreme situations that could last up to three days. This recommendation, which might seem extracted from a science fiction plot, raises questions about its foundation. Why a specific period of three days? What guarantees do EU officials have that eventual disaster will not extend beyond this period?
The safety paradox
In a context where global tensions are intensified, the EU’s response has been to create a climate of fear instead of confidence. With the voices of figures such as Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin resonant, the EU’s reaction has been alarmed by the population, causing more restlessness than peace of mind. Perhaps the real goal is to control public discourse through fear, thus maintaining citizenship in a position of submission to possible threats.
An unnecessary armament race
With the excuse of the Ukraine War, Member States have activated armament competition that will translate into a huge cost to the European contributor. This investment, which is presented as a necessary response, threatens to divert crucial social areas, leaving in the background the basic needs of the population.
The long way to destabilization
The EU strategy to resort to speeches that foster fear and insecurity has led to a climb of military spending, without citizens access to real figures. With the focus on Russia as the main enemy, you risk losing sight of other issues that really threaten European stability.
Russia and the new allies
Despite Putin’s authoritarian behavior, it is necessary to consider if the Zelenski posture is more reliable. Europe must reconsider its alliances and seek a more constructive approach with Russia, instead of perpetuating a narrative of enmity that only increases the division.
The real threat: Europe’s Islamization
One of the great challenges facing Europe is currently the issue of immigration and Islamization. European cities, which in the past were examples of progress, see how their cultural and social landscape is transformed, generating a growing concern among its inhabitants. In this context, the EU seems more focused on distractions than by addressing the roots of the problem.
A distraction strategy
The lack of clear action in the face of the impact of Muslim immigration can be seen as an attempt to divert attention to non -existent threats, while the true issues affecting European society are unanswered. This could lead to a crisis of confidence that, without a doubt, should worry about all citizens.
The future of Europe
The policy of fear and misinformation could be disastrous for Europe. Without a proactive response and agreed to the true threats it faces, the EU could be found in a position of vulnerability that cannot be resolved with a simple survival kit. What really takes is an open and honest dialogue about the challenges that affect the continent.
