Inici Ā» The Supreme Court of the United States questions the accusation of obstruction of the Capitol attackers

The Supreme Court of the United States questions the accusation of obstruction of the Capitol attackers

by PREMIUM.CAT
una muniĆ³ de gent dempeus davant d'un edifici amb columnes i una bandera que vola al vent davant seu, Anne Rigney, imatge promocional, una escultura de marbre, neoclassicisme

The Supreme Court of the United States questions the accusation of obstruction of the Capitol attackers

The Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision this Friday in which it questions the accusation of obstruction of justice against the assailants of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. According to the court, the prosecution went too far by accusing this crime of more than 350 people who participated in the assault on the US Congress and Senate. This decision means that lower courts will now apply this standard and are likely to dismiss charges against many of the defendants, including former President Donald Trump, who is also charged for his role in these events.

The context of the assault on the Capitol

On January 6, 2021, thousands of people, mostly supporters of former President Donald Trump, marched to the United States Capitol. During the demonstration, hundreds of people broke into the building while the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory was taking place. As a result of the assault, five people were killed and numerous police officers were injured. Since then, more than 1,000 people have been arrested across the country for crimes related to the attack (https://rereferencesbibliograficas.com/como-parafrasear/).

The Supreme Court’s decision

The Supreme Court has ruled that obstruction of justice charges can only be brought if prosecutors can prove that the assailants attempted not only to enter the building by force, but also to prevent the arrival of certificates confirming the election results. or encourage the destruction of documents to prevent the normal functioning of the official procedure. Most of the court’s justices believe that the obstruction charge would be a dangerous precedent that could criminalize a wide range of conduct and give prosecutors broad discretion to seek harsher sentences.

Implications for Donald Trump

This Supreme Court decision could have implications for former President Donald Trump, who faces several charges related to his role in the assault on the Capitol. If the standard set by the court is applied, Trump could avoid two of the four charges against him, including obstruction of an official proceeding. However, he still faces other charges, such as conspiracy to defraud the US Government and conspiracy to violate civil rights (https://www.duplichecker.com/es/article-rewriter.php).

You may also like

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00