Inici » Criticism of the municipal decision to declare the Pallars Jussà free of wolves

Criticism of the municipal decision to declare the Pallars Jussà free of wolves

by PREMIUM.CAT
Una escena 'vibrante' y 'dinámica' que representa una 'protesta' fuera de un edificio municipal en Tremp, donde se recopilan un grupo de 'ambientalistas' y 'activistas por los derechos de los animales'. Los activistas sostienen pancartas 'coloridas' con consignas como 'Protect the Wolves' y 'Science Matters', mostrando su pasión y determinación. El telón de fondo presenta la arquitectura 'histórica' del edificio, con 'banderas' revoloteando en el viento, simbolizando al gobierno local. En primer plano, un grupo diverso de individuos, incluidos activistas 'jóvenes' y 'mayores', se dedican a discusiones animadas, algunos apuntando hacia el edificio, mientras que otros están tomando fotos. La atmósfera se encarga de un sentido de urgencia y compromiso con la conservación de la vida silvestre, ya que los activistas expresan su descontento con la moción reciente que declara el área "libre de lobos". El cielo de arriba es un "azul claro", en contraste con las emociones "intensas" que muestran la multitud, destacand

Reactions of environmental and animalist organizations

Various entities dedicated to environmental protection, such as Adlo, Arba, Ecologists in Action, WWF and Adda, have expressed their deep disapproval towards the recent motion approved in six municipalities in Pallars Jussà, which declares the free region of wolves. They consider this decision to be a “compendium of nonsense” that challenges the scientific knowledge accumulated for decades of research on this species.

The political context of the motion

The approval of the motion has been highlighted in Tremp, where the PSC holds an absolute majority. Its mayor, Sílvia Romero, as well as being the Government Delegate in the High Pyrenees and Aran, has been criticized for aligning with ideas that organizations consider denialists, and to approve a rule that, according to them, lack of scientific basis.

Government demands

Environmental organizations have urged the President of the Government and the first secretary of the PSC, Salvador Illa, to take effective measures to curb the PSC attempts in the Alt Pyrenees to promote a negative perception of the wolf.

Argument against the motion

The entities have called into question the arguments filed in the motion, which states that the situation is critical, with only 21 sheep and goats reported dead by wolves in Catalonia in the last eight months, a figure that represents a minimum of 0.002% of the total of 910,000 sheep and 161,000 goats in the territory.

Myth on the invasive species

Another statement that entities reject is the consideration of the wolf from Franco -European populations as an invasive species. They argue that this is the same species as the Iberian, and that its introduction could help improve the genetic heritage of the local population and restore ecological balance, which is currently affected by the growth of wild boar and roe deer populations.

Impact on tourism

Contrary to the claim that the wolf is a danger to tourism, organizations argue that the presence of this animal can, in fact, attract visitors, as has been shown in various regions, both state and European.

Demystifying the wolves overpopulation

Organizations also reject the idea of ​​overcrowding wolves in Catalonia, indicating that there are currently about four wolves in an area of ​​32,000 square kilometers, that is, a wolf per 8,000 square kilometers, a very low density.

Lack of Documented Attacks in Humans

Finally, the claims that the wolves have attacked humans have flatly rejected. With an estimated population of almost 3,000 wolves across the peninsula, there are no attack records for people in the last 50 years. Therefore, the idea that four wolves in Catalonia could be a danger to the population is considered completely unfounded.

Final reflection

In a context where biodiversity conservation becomes more crucial, the political decisions that ignore scientific knowledge can have serious impact on the ecological balance and health of ecosystems. Society must weigh the implications of these actions and seek a path that integrates science and politics to guarantee a sustainable future.

You may also like

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00