Analysis of the Mossos d’Esquadra report
Recently, a document prepared by the Mossos d’Esquadra body has been sent to the Supreme Court, but this report presents several inaccuracies and statements that do not correspond to the reality of the events that surrounded the arrival of Carles Puigdemont in Barcelona in the past August 8 A premium.cat research team has delved into the facts and found information that contradicts the report’s conclusions.
Dismantling of the police operation
The police operation, which was intended to take effect on August 8, was closed without concrete results, despite the intense mobilization of police forces. With two activations of Operation Gàbia, the authorities caused a significant collapse in Barcelona and access routes to France, but their effectiveness is questionable.
Timeline of Puigdemont’s arrival
The report indicates that the police actions began at 22:00 on August 7, while Puigdemont had already been in the city for 25 hours. This information raises serious doubts about the preparation of the operation.
Contradictions in surveillance
The document also refers to a surveillance device that, according to the Mossos, included patrols and drone teams. However, witnesses claim that the drone units did not arrive until later in the morning, thus leaving a gap in the monitoring of the event.
Location of agents
The report details a distribution of forces that does not correspond to what was observed by those present. Several witnesses indicate that there were more agents than mentioned, as well as an active presence in the vicinity of the scene.
The critical moment of Puigdemont’s departure
Officers claimed to have observed the moment Puigdemont exited a tent, but witnesses say visibility was limited and his exit went unnoticed, contradicting the report’s claims.
Absence of visual evidence
The lack of images that capture the moment of his exit from the vehicle creates more uncertainty about the statements made by the agents, who claim to have watched the president at all times. This absence of visual evidence reinforces suspicions about the veracity of the report.
Reflection on police transparency
The analysis of the events of August 8 highlights the need for a review of police protocols and transparency in operational documentation. The discrepancy between the report and the witnesses indicates that a more thorough evaluation of police actions in situations of great political sensitivity is needed.
