Controversial decision in the heart of Andorra
Comú D’Ads-Engordany has decided to cancel a planned exhibition, in response to the growing concern for security after the elevation of terrorist alerts in nearby countries. With France at the maximum alert level and Spain also at critical levels, local authorities have opted for prudence.
Tension context in Europe
The Andorran authorities, headed by the Consul Major Rosa Gili, have taken the measure of suspending the exhibition entitled ‘Censorship is the curator of this exhibition’. This decision has been promoted not only by fear of security incidents, but also for the desire to avoid any controversy that could stain the reputation of Andorra.
Impact of recent events
The exhibition was going to present an emblematic work: the cover of Charlie Hebdo magazine, which became famous after the 2015 terrorist attack in Paris. Consul Gili has expressed concern about the possibility that the sample could generate tensions at a time when Andorra is on a maximum alert, especially with the proximity of small states games.
Reactions and consequences
The decision has generated a wave of criticism, especially among defenders of freedom of expression. Carles Guerra, artistic director of the prohibited art collection, said that the selection of the works had been previously approved and that this decision represents a setback in the fight against censorship.
Voices against censorship
Tatxo Benet, a prominent member of the curatorial team, has expressed disagreement with censorship, arguing that the purpose of the collection is precisely to educate and raise awareness about censorship and its repercussions. The artistic community has expressed its disappointment to this decision, considering that a valuable opportunity has been lost to promote a critical dialogue.
Commitment to security and culture
Comú D’Addes-Engordany has lamented any inconvenience caused by this decision, reiterating its commitment to freedom of expression. However, they emphasize that the security and well -being of the community are their priority. Despite the controversy, local authorities remain firm in their position to act cautiously in times of uncertainty.
