An unexpected reaction to the sentence
The recent ruling has provoked a wave of outrage and frustration between the community, which did not expect such a controversial outcome. While the debates focused on the duration of the sentence and the amount of 150,000 euros that the defendant paid as compensation, most trusted in a just sentence.
THE PAPER OF THE MAGISTRADE: A controversial figure
Judge Angels Vivas, known for her commitment to progressive justice, has been the center of attention. With a trajectory marked by his defense of women’s rights, his decision has been perceived as a disappointment for those who expected a verdict that reflected this stance.
A sentence that ignores the reality of the victims
With her background, it is disturbing that the magistrate and her team have not taken into account the impact that sexual violence has on women. The need to integrate the gender perspective into the judicial system is not optional; It is a legal duty that seeks to eliminate the sexist biases that still persist.
A technical analysis without empathy
The sentence, despite its technical accuracy, has been criticized for its coldness and lack of empathy. The magistrate has rejected several arguments of the allegations, as well as some of the defenses, using a legal language that is inaccessible to the average citizen.
The question of the reliability of the witness
The court has questioned the credibility of the testimony’s testimony, arguing that its alleged lack of reliability dismantles the presented probative structure. This position highlights a prejudice that ignores the complexity of the testimony in trauma situations.
The need for judicial training
The key to more effective justice lies in training. It is essential that the judges receive proper training in the field of gender violence and testimony of the witness. Without this knowledge, legal reforms are short and the judicial system continues to ignore the needs of the victims.
A message for future victims
The recent court decision is a decline for victims of sexual violence. The previous ruling was a positive precedent for feminism, but now a climate of distrust that can deter women of denouncing. Impunity becomes a reality that fosters silence in the face of aggression.
Alarming data on the complaint
According to recent data, only 8% of women report the sexual assault they suffer outside their partner. This percentage is slightly increased if you consider the complaints made by third parties, reflecting a deep problem of confidence in the judicial system.
The way to the recovery of trust
The need for an appeal to the Supreme Court is presented as a way of hope. There are precedents of revoked sentences that could help restore confidence in the system. However, it is urgent to ask how women can be encouraged to look for justice in a system that often fails.
