A meeting space or a barrier?
Parks must be meeting and fun places for the whole community, especially for those looking for a shelter during the warmer months. However, the recent decision to close the Viaduct Park Theater with a fence has raised controversy. This measure, promoted by the PSOE government and commitment at the request of the neighborhood association, aims to avoid abuse, but we must ask ourselves if it is really the most appropriate solution.
The value of preservation
It is undeniable that the City Council has made efforts to improve the conditions of the parks, a fact that is well received by the local communities that demand safe and cozy spaces. However, these improvements must be consistent with one goal: to make these spaces accessible and useful, instead of imposing restrictions that limit their functionality.
The dilemma of closing or opening
The new fence around the theater has not only closed access to space, but also eliminated its usefulness. If the problem was vandalism or dirt, closing the space does not solve the situation, but simply moves the problem elsewhere in the park. It is a response that does not address the cause of the problem and transforms a space of coexistence into an exclusionary area.
Psychological and social impact
The perception of an enclosed space can generate feelings of abandonment and insecurity among users. In addition, this decision can contribute to social exclusion, as it limits access to a space that should be community. Who will decide who can use the space and with what criteria? This uncertainty can lead to a division between the neighbors and generate an atmosphere of distrust.
Alternatives to revitalize the park
Instead of resorting to closures, it would be more productive to look for alternatives that promote the respectful use of the space. Organizing cultural and community activities could revitalize the theater and make it a meeting point for everyone. What really lacks is a plan to stimulate the space, not a barrier that keeps it closed.
The responsibility of the government
Governments must carefully evaluate the demands of citizens and their possible consequences. A solution cannot be applied without considering if it really benefits the community at general. Closing spaces may seem like an immediate solution, but often leads to abandonment and creation of unsafe areas.
Reconsider the management of public spaces
The management of public spaces must focus on promoting coexistence and free use, not on prohibition. It is a key time to rethink how we can make our parks more alive, accessible and useful to all, without falling into measures that exclude and limit their social function.
