Immigration as the central axis of social debate
Immigration has emerged as a crucial issue in political and social debate, affecting multiple areas such as housing, security and community cohesion. Recently, opinions on immigration have undergone significant change, moving from mass foster care to a more restrictive and cautious approach.
An ideological evolution
Migratory policies have experienced a remarkable metamorphosis, with the era of open doors under the Merkel Chancellor as a starting point. Now, the trend is towards a tougher policy, a change that is also palpable in Catalonia, where the host initiatives have given way to a more reserved attitude.
The bonism and its limitations
The notion of bonism has lost weight in political discourse, revealing that migratory issues go beyond humanitarian considerations. Alejandro Fernández, leader of the PP in Catalonia, emphasized the importance of acting to avoid the mistakes that have brought to other European countries in the crisis.
The NEOS Foundation report
The document entitled ‘Immigration to Spain: Bonism or effectiveness’ seeks to bring a new perspective to the debate on immigration, emphasizing the importance of dealing with this topic with realism and effectiveness. The report emphasizes that it is essential to analyze the quantity, origin and integration of immigrants, taking into account the absorption capacity of the country.
Differentiation between types of immigrants
It is proposed that governments and media recognize two essential distinctions: the difference between refugees and economic immigrants, and the need for a selective immigration policy. Ignoring these aspects can lead to the saturation of the country’s resources, affecting both residents and newcomers.
The need for active politics
The report advocates replacing passive migratory management, which tolerates irregularity, with an active strategy that promotes regular and selected immigration. This proposal seeks to avoid the errors of the past that have been in an open door policy that has not borne fruit.
Comparison between different types of immigration
Comparisons between Maghreb and Ukrainian refugees reveal significant demographic patterns. While Ukrainian refugees include a diversity of ages and genres, most Maghreb immigrants are young men, which can affect integration dynamics.
The challenges of integration
Finally, the report emphasizes that current policies are not achieving effective integration. This is reflected in various indicators such as economic inequality, educational delay, endogamy and crime rates, aspects that can be clearly observed in the Catalan context.
A reflection on the future of immigration
In an increasingly interconnected world, immigration will continue to be a topic of light debate. It is essential that policies evolve to meet the challenges it presents, guaranteeing harmonious and respectful coexistence among all communities.
