Inici » The disturbing absence of a unified European voice

The disturbing absence of a unified European voice

by PREMIUM.CAT
Una bulliciosa escena parisina, con la icónica 'Torre Eiffel' que se eleva en el fondo, parcialmente envuelta en una suave niebla de la niebla temprana de la mañana. El primer plano está lleno de una multitud diversa de 'líderes europeos', vestidos con trajes formales, involucrados en discusiones animadas, sus expresiones una mezcla de determinación y preocupación. En el centro, 'Emmanuel Macron' tiene una postura segura, gesticulando mientras habla, encarnando el papel de la 'potencia europea'. A su alrededor, se representan figuras que representan 'Alemania', 'Italia', 'España', 'Polonia' y el 'Reino Unido', algunas con cejas fruncidas, que indican tensión y desacuerdo. La atmósfera está acusada de urgencia, ya que las pancartas que representan la 'Comisión Europea' y la 'OTAN' aleten en la brisa. Cerca, una mesa está cargada de documentos y mapas, simbolizando las negociaciones serias que tienen lugar. El cielo de arriba es una mezcla de blues y grises suaves, insinuando la seriedad de las discusiones a co

The question that resonates in Europe

Henry Kissinger’s famous phrase, ‘Who should I call if I want to talk to Europe?’, It reflects the fragmentation of European influence on the global scenario. More than forty years later, the matter continues to find an answer, revealing the weakness of a Europe struggling to make its voice heard.

Summit in Paris: an effortless effort

On February 17, Paris hosted a meeting of European leaders with the aim of forging a unified position before the administration of Donald Trump and the conflict in Ukraine. France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland, United Kingdom, the European Commission and NATO met in an attempt to consolidate a coordinated response, but the divergences emerged rapidly.

Differences in military strategy

Just after the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, suggested the possibility of a European peace force, several states expressed their reluctance. France had proposed a ‘comfort of comfort’, but allies such as Germany and Poland described the idea of ​​premature and reckless, emphasizing the lack of consensus.

A secondary role in Ukraine conflict

Since the beginning of the Russian invasion, Europe has been confined to a role of weapons and financial support supplier, while the United States has exercised indisputable political leadership. This dynamic has left Europe in a position of inferiority, without Brussels proposing a coherent peace plan after three years of conflict.

The dilemma of military funding

As the debate on increasing military spending progresses, the lack of agreement between Member States becomes apparent. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk sought to reduce tensions, but Germany’s refusal to accept shared debt broadcast for defense illustrates internal fractures that hinder a unified approach.

A FUTUR INCERT per to the European Defense

The European Commission’s proposal to relax the rules of deficit to allow greater investment in defense could be a first step in a more active reaction in some countries, such as Spain. However, the Paris summit has shown Europe’s inability to articulate a coherent foreign policy and a common defense.

Cacophony in European foreign policy not only reveals the lack of consensus, but also the inability to formulate significant initiatives. Thus, Europe is trapped in a secondary role, following the directions of other powers, including Emmanuel Macron, without being able to define its course in today’s world.

You may also like

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00