Inici » The identity of journalism: between activism and professionalism

The identity of journalism: between activism and professionalism

by PREMIUM.CAT
Una escena de "estimulante" que representa a un "periodista" sentado en un escritorio desordenado, rodeado de montones de "documentos" y "libros" sobre "ética de los medios" y "periodismo". El escritorio está iluminado por una cálida 'lámpara de escritorio', lanzando un brillo suave en el 'cuaderno' lleno de notas garabateadas y 'preguntas' sobre las líneas borrosas entre 'activismo' y 'periodismo'. En el fondo, una 'pantalla de computadora' muestra un artículo de noticias, con secciones resaltadas que enfatizan la 'confusión' en la profesión. Las paredes están adornadas con 'artículos enmarcados' y 'premios', que muestran las 'luchas' y 'logros' de la profesión. Una ventana revela un 'paisaje urbano' afuera, simbolizando el paisaje de periodismo 'dinámico' y 'siempre cambiante'. La atmósfera general es una de 'introspección' y 'urgencia', lo que refleja los desafíos que enfrentan los periodistas en el mantenimiento de su integridad en medio del aumento del 'activismo' y la 'información errónea'.

The diffuse contours of the journalistic profession

The world of journalism is presented with a complex nature, where the lines that delimit their practice are not always clear. Unlike other professions, there is no specific training requirement that determines who can exercise as a journalist, which generates a certain ambiguity in his definition.

The confusion between journalism and activism

One of the great threats to the integrity of journalism is the increase in activism that is hidden under the information layer. This activism can take many forms, but all of them share a common goal: to distort the truth to achieve social or political changes. The key here is to recognize that activism seeks to transform the world, while journalism has the mission of explaining it.

The dividing line between information and propaganda

It is essential to establish a distinction between journalism that seeks the truth and activism that uses journalistic narrative to promote a specific agenda. Although it is true that absolute objectivity is a difficult ideal to achieve, journalists must maintain a commitment to the facts and the diversity of voices.

The new actors in the media field

In recent years, we have seen the emergence of a new type of means that challenge the credibility of traditional channels. These media often focus on discrediting the conventional press, presenting themselves as savors of a new era of freedom of expression. However, its approach is often based on misinformation and lack of rigor.

Why do they attract citizens?

The attractiveness of these means lies in their ability to connect with the concerns of the citizenry, addressing issues that have been ignored by traditional political parties. Topics such as immigration, security and the economic crisis have been out of political debate, creating a gap that these new actors have taken advantage of.

Reflections on the future of journalism

The question arises is whether journalism can learn from these mistakes that have led politics to a crisis of representativeness. Journalism must reflect on its mission and the way it communicates with society. If you do not act on time, the risk of an anti -triodism that prevails about true information is becoming more and more imminent.

The importance of credibility

Credibility is the foundation of journalism. At a time when the misinformation is rampant, professionals must reaffirm their commitment to truth and transparency. Only in this way will they be able to regain the confidence of the public and ensure a sustainable future for the profession.

You may also like

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00