An unexpected turn to US foreign policy
Donald Trump has returned to the White House with a radically different approach compared to his first term. Since taking office on January 20, it has begun a series of measures that have raised controversy, including threats aimed at countries such as Greenland, Panama and Canada, as well as a controversial project to transform the Gaza Strip into a tourist destination after moving the Palestinian population.
Reviews in International Relations
Trump’s new term affects relations with Latin American countries, but also has altered the US stance on the Ukraine War. He has expressed derogatory opinions on Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelenski and seeks a peace agreement that involves significant concessions for Ukraine, who until now were unacceptable to the West.
Europe’s reaction and military reinforcement
With the increase in tensions, Europe has responded with determination. The European Union has reaffirmed its support for Ukraine and has proposed a rearmament plan with an estimated cost of more than 800 billion euros. This situation has generated questions about the viability of effective European rearmament in the face of current economic realities.
The reality of the European military complex
Despite the high defense budgets, Europe is facing an operating challenge with a fragmented and poorly integrated weapons system. This has been evident in the military response to Ukraine, where the lack of unified military infrastructure has made it difficult to coordinate.
The opportunity to end the conflict
In the context of the first weeks of Trump’s presidency, there is a change in the priorities that could open an opportunity for peace in Ukraine. However, its popularity in Congress is limited, and the support of the two main political parties does not coincide with its new direction.
Internal and external challenges
Its strategy can find resistance both nationally and internationally. The pressure of European allies advocating a more warlike stance could further complicate their efforts for an agreement with Russia.
Russia and US
Russia’s intentions focus on recovering Ukraine neutrality and ensuring that there are no NATO bases in the country. The U.S. seems to have a more confusing agenda, with a need to maintain its global influence while containing the rise of China.
The need for a European dialogue
The European political elite has been trapped in a U.S. dependency dynamic, and is now in a precarious situation. To move forward, Europe should reconsider its strategy and seek direct dialogue with Russia, instead of depending on the decisions adopted in Washington.
Futuristic perspectives: alliances and strategies
The future of US and Russia relations depends on the durability of Trump’s presidency. Its intention to approach Russia may seem late, but it also opens a new possibility for distension. A closer collaboration could include an exchange of troops withdrawals, which could benefit the safety of Eastern Europe.
