The Mystery of the Alleged Terrorist Leader
Let’s imagine, for a moment, that Judge Manuel García Castellón’s statement, supported by the prosecutors and judges of the Supreme Court, is true. Suppose that former president Carles Puigdemont is the absolute leader of a terrorist group, the head of a violent and criminal organization, willing to commit acts of extreme violence, including murders and kidnappings, with an organized gang capable of carrying out these sinister objectives. .
Incompetence and Delay in Investigation
If this hypothesis is true, the question arises about the degree of incompetence of the prominent jurists involved in this investigation. What explanations should they offer for the considerable delay in progressing this case?
Questions and Reflections
If Puigdemont were the alleged leader of a criminal organization, why were four years of impunity allowed? Why didn’t the Supreme Court and the National Court alert the authorities of other countries about the presence of an alleged terrorist on the loose, even in the European Parliament? Why was this serious crime not included in the European warrants requesting his arrest? These questions raise questions about the management of this case.
Analysis of the Supreme Court Decision
It has been highlighted that the Supreme Court’s decision to charge Puigdemont with terrorism was made unanimously. However, it is important to note that the judges who signed this order belong to the conservative sector, which raises questions about the impartiality of the decision.
Considerations on Political Implications
The possibility is raised that the terrorism accusation arises at a strategic moment to prevent Puigdemont from benefiting from an eventual amnesty, which suggests a political motivation behind the decision. Furthermore, the application of a restrictive criminal approach is analyzed, even exceeding certain limits, in cases that represent a threat to the stability of the State.
The Future of Research
Uncertainty arises about the direction that Justice will take in this case, considering possible previous judicial errors and the possible influence of political factors on the development of the investigation.
Conclusion
The enigma surrounding the alleged involvement of Carles Puigdemont as a terrorist leader raises questions about the competence of jurists, the impartiality of judicial decisions and the possible political motivations behind this case. The future of research and its implications for the stability of the State generate uncertainty and reflection.
