The Supreme Court and its controversial decision
The recent ruling of the Supreme Court has again highlighted the complexity of the case of Carles Puigdemont. This judicial body has supported the position of Judge Pablo Llarena, who has opposed the amnesty in relation to the crime of embezzlement that affects Puigdemont, Toni Comín and Lluís Puig.
The reaction of government and political perspective
Despite this refusal, the Government maintains its goals and plans to continue advancing in the application of amnesty before the arrival of summer. This decision has generated a climate of tension and expectation, as Puigdemont’s fate seems to be in the hands of the Constitutional Court, which is considered by many as one of the most influential bodies in Spanish politics.
The defense and the tribunal of the court
The defenses of those involved filed appeal appeal to the Supreme Court after Llarena rejected his application for amnesty last July. The prosecution initially showed a favorable stance on acceptance of these resources, which led to a certain hope among the defendants.
The legal framework and implications
However, the Supreme Court has determined that Llarena’s position is in accordance with current regulations. According to the magistrates, amnesty cannot be applied to the crime of embezzlement if it has been acted to benefit personally in a patrimonial manner. This interpretation has led to the acceptance of the judge’s decision, thus rejecting the appeals presented.
The Paper of the Constitutional Court
With the exhausted jurisdiction, the future of amnesty is now in the hands of the Constitutional Court, which could be the key factor in determining if Puigdemont will receive the measure of grace. Carles Cerdán, representative of the PSOE, has already expressed his intention to ensure that amnesty be materialized in the coming weeks.
Expectations and repercussions
If the Constitutional Court decides in favor of Puigdemont, a turbulent chapter could be closed in its legal struggle, while also consolidating a political commitment dating to the investiture agreement that Pedro Sánchez brought to the presidency in November 2023.However, the delay in amnesty has begun to affect Puigdemont’s credibility, generating concerns among his followers.
Final reflection
The Supreme Court’s decision may not be the last word, but it certainly prolongs a period of uncertainty for Carles Puigdemont. The current situation reflects the tensions between politics and justice in Spain, and the outcome of this episode could have significant repercussions on the future of the country.
