The lieutenant prosecutor of the Supreme Court presents a report on the cause of the Democratic Tsunami
The lieutenant prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Àngels Sánchez Conde, presented this Thursday the report on the cause of the Democratic Tsunami. In this report, Sánchez Conde states that there is not enough evidence to investigate Carles Puigdemont for terrorism. This decision contradicts the decision of the prosecutors of the Supreme Court, but agrees with the criterion of the prosecutor Miguel Ángel Carballo of the National Court, who also rules out the possibility of terrorism in this case.
The lieutenant prosecutor asks that the case be returned to the National Court
The lieutenant prosecutor, in her report, requests that the Democratic Tsunami case be returned to the National Court to continue investigating the facts. The report has been sent to the second room of the Supreme Court, which will have to decide whether or not to stay with the procedure.
The report maintains that there are no indications to implicate Puigdemont in the organization of Democratic Tsunami
The report, which consists of 31 pages, maintains that there are no indications to involve Carles Puigdemont in the organization of Democratic Tsunami and the protests against the sentence. According to the report, the investigating judge relies on guesswork or suspicion to charge him with a crime of terrorism. In addition, the report argues that the reasoned exposition that it sent to the Supreme Court in November does not allow to conclude that Puigdemont was involved in Democratic Tsunami.
The fiscal lieutenant questions the qualification of Democratic Tsunami as a terrorist organization
The fiscal lieutenant questions the qualification of Democratic Tsunami as a terrorist organization. In his report, he maintains that the investigation is insufficient to consider Democratic Tsunami as a structured and hierarchical organization with the aim of subverting the constitutional order. He also criticizes the fact that the instructor wants to send the case to the Supreme Court and at the same time agree on several procedures that have not been carried out.
The final decision will fall to the criminal court of the Supreme Court
The final decision on whether or not to continue the procedure will fall to the criminal court of the Supreme Court, in charge of judge Jan Ramon Berdugo. It is this chamber that will decide whether the case remains in the National Court or whether it is transferred to the Supreme Court for a more thorough investigation.
