The consequences of semantic alterations
Altering the semantic load of terms can cause significant changes in these words, leading to misunderstandings, misunderstandings and distortions of discourse.
It is crucial to be aware of these alterations, especially in areas such as communication, teaching and journalism, where the appropriate use of language is essential to avoid confusion.
An example with the Reuters Agency
The Reuters Agency, an influential international news agency, has restricted the use of the terms ‘terrorism’ and ‘terrorist’ among its editors, considering that they can distort reality and generate confusion in the audience.
These cases demonstrate how semantic alterations can affect the perception of facts and the transmission of information.
The distortion of terms like ‘freedom’ and ‘taxation’
The incorrect use of terms like ‘freedom’ can lead to a distortion of its meaning, as seen in the current political context.
Likewise, the use of the term ‘imposition’ in the language debate can generate confusion and misinformation about the true dynamics of language promotion.
Semantic manipulation around corruption
The discourse on corruption often becomes a tool to discredit political opponents, generating confusion and chaos in the perception of the facts.
It is essential to be critical of the use of language in contexts where the meanings and connotations of terms can be altered, as this can influence the way events are perceived.
Conclusions
It is necessary to be alert to the semantic alterations that occur in public discourse and to be aware of the power that words have to influence the perception of reality.
Confronting manipulated and distorted communication requires a critical look and an attitude of searching for the truth beyond appearances.
