Inici » Decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rocío Carrasco and Antonio David Flores

Decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rocío Carrasco and Antonio David Flores

by PREMIUM.CAT
una dona amb vestit i un home amb vestit estan fora d'un edifici amb columnes i columnes darrere d'ella, Araceli Gilbert, imatge promocional, un retrat, premsa privada

The verdict of the Supreme Court

After years of waiting, the Supreme Court has issued a ruling in relation to one of the most famous complaints that Rocío Carrasco has filed against Antonio David Flores. However, the magistrate’s decision was not what many expected.

The legal process

In 2017, Rocío Carrasco decided to take legal action against her ex-husband for an alleged crime of continued psychological abuse. At first, this demand was provisionally dismissed. However, a year later, a judge ordered the process to be reopened considering that there were indications that Rocío Carrasco was right. But later the Justice accepted the appeal presented by Antonio David Flores.

The final decision

Now, after considering the absence of new evidence and witnesses that support Rocío Carrasco’s version, the Supreme Court judge has decided to definitively close the case. This means that, on this occasion, justice has once again given Antonio David Flores the right.

Other pending legal matters

Despite this victory, Antonio David Flores still has other pending legal confrontations with Rocío Carrasco. In 2017, Rocío Carrasco filed a lawsuit against her ex-husband for an alleged theft of assets. According to Rocío Carrasco’s defense, Antonio David Flores would have been receiving money for his magazine covers in the name of third parties, with the aim of hiding his financial assets. If Antonio David Flores is found guilty of this crime, he could face a prison sentence and restitution.

conclusion

In summary, the Supreme Court has filed Rocío Carrasco’s lawsuit against Antonio David Flores for continued psychological abuse. However, there are still other pending legal issues between the two. This decision has generated controversy and continues to be a topic of interest to the media and the general public.

You may also like

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00